The journey / F40 / 80022
Mansell's F40.
A famous first keeper, a disputed sale and two public auctions. Follow chassis 80022 through the dates we can trace, and the years still waiting for evidence.
1989 — 2014
7 entries. 2 sources.
Follow the dates, photographs and accounts. Undated material and historical context are marked; the gaps stay visible.
Start the journey01
1989
The Mansell years
A first keeper named in both auction catalogues. The delivery papers and exact sequence of the later sale still need review.
30 March 1989
Ownership
Delivered to Nigel Mansell
Location not established
Bonhams and Artcurial identify Mansell as the first keeper. The supplied research dates delivery to 30 March 1989; the original delivery papers remain unreviewed.
Both auction catalogues name the same first keeper. The precise delivery date remains an attributed detail.
Summer 1989
Transfer
A disputed sale
Sequence unresolved
Later accounts describe a dispute over the car's sale. They disagree about the exact sequence involving the subsequent dealers.
The disagreement belongs in the record. Later accounts alone do not settle the sequence.
02
2005 — 2012
The French chapter
A French association, reported certification and reported maintenance. Three leads back to original paperwork.
2005
Association
A French chapter
Northern France · reported
Published accounts associate the car with Dominique Verbaere in northern France. Artcurial photographs later show the Verbaere names and dealership banner on the car.
The Verbaere names and dealership banner can be seen in the later Artcurial photographs. That supports an association, not a date of ownership.
2008
Certification
Classiche certification reported
Location not established
Bonhams says Ferrari Classiche certification accompanied the car and was issued in 2008.
The existence and issue year are reported by Bonhams. The underlying pages are not available in this edition.
January 2012
Maintenance
Belts and water pump
Workshop not established
Bonhams reports replacement of the cam belts and water pump at 35,800 km.
A useful maintenance milestone. Its date, work and mileage are catalogue claims pending review of the invoice.
03
2012 — 2014
On the public record
Two auction houses, two dated sale results. Their photographs record the car’s appearance at each sale.
3 February 2012
Public sale
Sold at Rétromobile
Paris, France
Artcurial sold chassis 80022 as lot 313 and published a result of €374,561.
- Auction house
- Artcurial
- Sale / lot
- 2107 / 313
The auction house’s own result establishes a public sale. It does not independently confirm every claim in the accompanying history.
10 October 2014
Public sale
Sold at Zoute
Zoute, Belgium
Bonhams sold the car as lot 19 for €690,000 including premium. Its gallery records the sliding windows and beige leather seats.
- Auction house
- Bonhams
- Lot
- 19
The gallery shows sliding windows and beige leather seats. Those visible details describe the car at the sale; they do not establish its original specification.
The source register
Where the story comes from.
Each account keeps its source and the questions still open.
Auction catalogue & published result
Artcurial, Rétromobile 2012, sale 2107, lot 313
Documents the Rétromobile sale and its published result. The earlier history remains an attributed catalogue account.
Read the published sourceAuction catalogue, gallery & published result
Bonhams, Zoute 2014, lot 19
Documents the Zoute sale, published result and photographed appearance. Delivery, certification and maintenance details still require their original records.
Read the published sourceStill to discover
What would connect the chapters?
Can the delivery papers, court records and service invoices confirm the dates repeated in later accounts?
The original delivery
Can delivery papers confirm the date and first-keeper account?
The sale dispute
Can contemporary court and transfer records establish the sequence?
The years in between
Which dated records connect the 1989 account to the French chapter?
Certification and maintenance
Can the 2008 certificate and January 2012 service invoice be examined?